Improving the Usability of a Higher Education Website

CLIENT Pratt Institute Communications
MY ROLE Researcher, Evaluator, Prototyper
TIMELINE October - December 2019

The communications office of the Pratt Institute tasked our team of four usability experts with evaluating the usability of the school’s website, Pratt.edu. Working with me were Archana Ravi, Shivani Ishwar, and Hyerim Hwang.

Our stakeholders ask specifically that we focus on current and prospective students, and to evaluate their desktop and mobile interfaces. This design story is the result of 7 weeks of usability experiments and the analysis and report of our findings.

Preparing the Tests

GOAL: To create a user experiment that was rigorous, ethical, and efficient


What We Did

  • Deliverables: Test script with tasks, consent form

  • Elements to Evaluate: Homepage, Admissions, News, Events

  • Platforms to Evaluate: Desktop, mobile

  • User Groups: Current students, prospective students

What We Learned

  • One user test should last under 45 minutes.

  • To test every element that the stakeholder asked for in this time, each task needed to be simple.

  • An evaluation of the test was essential before we began recruiting participants to iron out flaws and ensure that our research questions were being answered.

Recruiting Participants

GOAL: To gather 8 test participants who fit into our stakeholder’s desired user groups


What We Did

Determined target participants, methods, and resources

  • Target Participants: Current Pratt undergraduate students who were considering graduate school (at Pratt or otherwise)

  • Methods: Online questionnaire to determine eligibility, email correspondence for scheduling

  • Resources: Mailing list from Pratt Communications of Juniors and Seniors, offer of Amazon Gift Cards as compensation

What We Learned

  • Putting time estimates on all tasks was crucial in getting potential test subjects to fill out our questionnaire.

  • It was important to avoid saying which interface we would be using for tests, to prevent users from “coming prepared”.

  • Word of mouth was often more effective in recruiting participants than a mass email; many of the recruits we scheduled were coworkers or friends with whom we could discuss our work.

Conducting User Research

GOAL: Gather written and audiovisual data from user tests


What We Did

  • Data collection methods: pre- and post- questionnaires, think-aloud, verbal difficulty ratings, screen and audio recordings with 6 undergraduate students who were considering graduate education

  • Tools: iMac with QuickTime, user’s personal mobile device, PEVO V4K Ultra High Definition USB Document Camera

  • Team members: study moderator, note taker

What We Learned

  • Putting time estimates on all tasks was crucial in getting potential test subjects to fill out our questionnaire.

  • It was important to avoid saying which interface we would be using for tests, to prevent users from “coming prepared”.

  • Word of mouth was often more effective in recruiting participants than a mass email; many of the recruits we scheduled were coworkers or friends with whom we could discuss our work.

Our full testing setup, for recording desktop and mobile interactions

A close-up of the PEVO V4K Ultra High Definition USB Document Camera, used for recording mobile devices

Analyzing the Results

GOAL: Analyze the data from our user research to create actionable recommendations

What We Did

  • Tabulated results; tasks were given a score of 2 (completed the task), 1 (completed the task with some difficulty), and 0 (did not complete the task).

  • Listened to and watched each of the tests to extract quotes and observations from the recordings

What We Learned

7 out of 8 participants ignored the side navigation panel. The one participant who did use it finished their tasks in the fastest time with the least difficulty.

5 out of 8 participants were unable to orient themselves in the site’s architecture, and couldn’t tell if they were looking at graduate or undergraduate pages.

Information presented in paragraph form was difficult to find. All 8 participants skimmed through a page for headings before delving deeper.

All 8 participants expressed frustration towards the site’s mobile presentation, saying that many visual elements were only functional on a larger screen.

Tasks

  1. Find information about how to visit Pratt, and meet with a Pratt representative.

  2. Find out what graduate programs are available at Pratt.

  3. Find the application deadline for the Fall 2020 semester for a graduate program you might be interested in at Pratt.

  4. Find an estimate for the tuition and other costs associated with a graduate program you might be interested in at Pratt.

  5. Find any recent news items about Pratt’s national ranking.

  6. Find an event happening at Pratt on December 4th.

  7. Find an event that you might be interested in attending at Pratt.

Performance ratings for each task by participant. Each task was given a 2 (completed the task), 1 (completed the task with difficulty) or 0 (did not complete the task)

Suggesting Changes to the Interface

GOAL: Present our recommendations to improve the Pratt website


What We Did

Presented our findings and recommendations to our client:

  • Make better use of navigational features on the website and emphasize the side panel.

  • Implement a complete separation between Undergraduate and Graduate admissions information

  • Make improvements to the page layouts, specifically by favoring an image-based layout and consistent heading and list styles

  • Improve the responsiveness of the mobile interface by fixing the stacking issues caused by a smaller width (like in the calendar prototype below)

NOTE: The images below represent our recommended changes. The current images can be found in our final presentation.

What We Learned

  • Recommendations that involve removing an element of the site needed to have a suggestion of where that element would be represented elsewhere.

  • While some recommendation involved previously-templated visual elements, others would take much more design work in the site’s backend. However, most of that new work could be templated for future use.

  • The process for making visual changes often involved more than one department under the office of communications; all changes were collaborative.

  • This study was the most recent of many students evaluating the Pratt website.

Reflection

Before this study, Pratt’s Digital Communication department had collaborated with the School of Information in a similar way in previous semesters. After conducting this user test, I was hired as a Graduate Assistant with in Digital Communications and given the opportunity to synthesize this research. The results of this case study will be a part of a larger redesign of Pratt.edu.